Karen Read, The Boston Police, and the Cover-Up: Why I Believe She Was Framed
Why I Believe She Was Framed – and How a Blogger Became Her Loudest Ally
By RICHIE D MOWREY for The Sassy Gazette (The Gossip You Didn’t Know You Needed)
Executive Summary
Karen Read’s murder trials will go down as one of Massachusetts’ most divisive legal sagas. On paper, it was about whether Read backed over her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe, and left him to die in a blizzard. But in reality? It was about corruption, credibility, and whether the Boston Police Department and Norfolk County DA’s Office would protect their own at all costs even if it meant framing an innocent woman.
I’ve said from the start: I believe Karen Read is innocent. I believe she was targeted in a sloppy, politically protected cover-up, where the truth was bent, twisted, and buried. The DA’s Office? In my opinion, they’re no better than the cops they work with they lie, spin, and hide evidence when it suits them.
And if it weren’t for Aidan Kearney, better known as Turtleboy, a relentless and often controversial blogger who blew holes in the official story, the public wouldn’t have seen half the cracks in this case. He was arrested for his efforts, but his coverage shifted the narrative in a way few journalists if we can even call him that ever could.
Now, the criminal side of this nightmare is over. Read has been acquitted of all major charges, convicted only of OUI. But the fight isn’t over. A civil trial looms, and the O’Keefe family’s wrongful death lawsuit means the cover-up, the corruption, and the truth are all about to be back under the microscope.
The Death of John O’Keefe and the Frame Job That Followed
January 29, 2022. Canton, Massachusetts. John O’Keefe is found on the front lawn of fellow officer Brian Albert’s home, unconscious and bleeding. The temperature is brutal, the snow is falling. By 7:59 a.m., he’s dead.
Within hours, the story starts forming not in the press, but inside law enforcement circles. And it isn’t the truth.
Prosecutors say Read drunkenly backed over O’Keefe with her Lexus after dropping him at the party, then left him to freeze to death. They say she admitted it multiple times. They point to DNA on a broken taillight, scratches on her SUV, and “guilt” in her words.
I say that’s nonsense.
The defense says and I believe O’Keefe was killed inside the Albert home, possibly beaten, possibly bitten by the family dog, then dumped outside. And that a tight-knit network of cops, troopers, and a federal agent cleaned it up, planted evidence, and pinned it on Read.
The First Trial April 2024: The Jury Wouldn’t Buy It
The prosecution threw its usual playbook: emotional first responder testimony, physical evidence they swore was airtight, and the narrative that Read was drunk, angry, and jealous.
The defense fired back with what I think is the most important fact: there was no collision. Expert after expert testified the injuries didn’t match a car strike. They pointed out the shady way taillight evidence was “found” days later, the destruction of phones by key players, and lead investigator Michael Proctor’s vile, biased text messages calling Read a “whack job” and vowing she’d never walk free.
The jury? Hung. Starkly divided. They couldn’t convict her on murder, manslaughter, or leaving the scene. The only thing they agreed on was OUI.
The Second Trial April 2025: The Acquittal
By the time the second trial rolled around, the defense had more ammo: Proctor was fired from the Massachusetts State Police, the federal agent admitted destroying his phone, and more digital forensics showed the official timeline was flimsy.
The prosecution tried a new spin calling it a “domestic violence homicide” to give her a motive. But the jury didn’t bite.
On June 18, 2025, Read walked out cleared of all serious charges. She got one year of probation for OUI a “mercy verdict” if there ever was one.
Turtleboy: The Loudest Voice in the Room
You can’t tell this story without talking about Turtleboy. Love him or hate him, Aidan Kearney was the one hammering away at inconsistencies from day one. He wasn’t afraid to call out cops by name, dig into phone records, or post things mainstream media wouldn’t touch.
The DA’s Office hated him so much they charged him with witness intimidation. They tried to silence him, but by then, his reporting had blown this case wide open in the court of public opinion.
Was Turtleboy biased? Absolutely. Did he get messy? Constantly. But he also kept the pressure on and without that pressure, I don’t think the truth about Proctor, Higgins, or the taillight evidence would have come out before it was too late.
The Civil Trial The Fight Continues
Now, the O’Keefe family is suing Read and two bars, claiming wrongful death. Civil court is different: it’s not “beyond a reasonable doubt” it’s “preponderance of evidence.” That’s a much lower bar, and the same evidence that failed in criminal court could look different to a civil jury.
But here’s what’s also different: civil trials allow for broader discovery. That means the defense could get access to even more text messages, phone records, and behind-the-scenes communications from the cops and DA’s office.
If the cover-up is as deep as I believe, the civil case might be where the ugliest truths finally come out.
Why This Case Matters
This isn’t just about Karen Read. It’s about what happens when law enforcement closes ranks. It’s about how a DA’s office can spin a case to protect its allies. And it’s about the power of outside voices even messy ones to challenge the official story.
The Boston Police Department has a credibility crisis. The Norfolk DA’s Office isn’t far behind. And thanks to this case, more people than ever are watching.
What do you think? Was Karen Read the victim of a frame job, or did the jury get it wrong?
The civil trial is coming. The stakes are still high. And I’ll be watching.
Comments
Post a Comment